Home Blog Page 429

European Women in Finance : Madelaine Jones : Steering through volatile markets

Madelaine Jones, Oaktree Capital Management.

Madelaine Jones, portfolio manager for the European high yield bond and senior loan strategies at Oaktree Capital Management, talks to Lynn Strongin Dodds about lessons learnt, creating career paths and staying engaged.

Although Covid-19 is an unprecedented event, Madelaine Jones, portfolio manager for the European high yield bond and senior loan strategies at Oaktree Capital Management, is no stranger to setbacks, having navigated the global financial crisis and more minor bumps along her 20-year career. The dynamics may differ today but in many ways the strategy remains the same – stay calm and look for the most promising prospects.

“You can’t predict every event but there will always be risk on and risk off market cycles,” says Jones who is also co-manager for the global high yield strategy and head of the firm’s EMEA Diversity & Inclusion committee. “The covid-19 situation is not the same, but investor behaviour is similar to other crises.”

She adds, “I am always the most fearful when everything seems to be going well and investors are at their most relaxed, but are not getting paid appropriately for unseen risk. There is a false sense of security. But the market had a wake-up call this year, and as in the past there followed a dramatic move and a shift to being perhaps overly defensive from not being defensive enough.”

This was exactly the scenario in March when the virus seemed out of control in many parts of the world. Central banks acted swiftly pumping trillions of sterling, yen, euros and dollars into the system which triggered a flight into safe haven assets and an exodus from the riskier instruments. European high yield bonds and senior loans were particularly hard hit at the end of the first quarter with rapid price deterioration and sell-offs.

Companies across the spectrum, even those that were fundamentally sound with a low risk of default and strong balance sheets were punished, according to Jones. However, “this is also the time when you have to hold your nerve, recalibrate, be mindful of the risks but look for the sound companies that are heavily discounted,” she adds.

Jones says that senior members of the team who have on average 20 years of experience investing across multiple credit cycles were well equipped to ride out the storm, extract value and find the right opportunities in the current environment. In fact, they began to reposition their portfolios defensively before the virus took hold against an optimistic market mood. In addition, the portfolios were already well diversified which Jones says “is a cheap form of protection” especially when there is a single event.

Their success was partly down to the detailed research that is undertaken to assess companies and a skill that attracted Jones to her first job as a financial analyst. “I have always had an interest in understanding how successful companies continued to succeed,” she says. “This led me to study economics and then I went straight from university to a job in debt capital markets.”

The linear path led her to Deutsche Bank in 2000 as an associate in leverage finance origination where she was exposed to a wide spectrum of corporates across a range of sectors. At the time, the German based bank was top of the league table and as Jones notes, “the transactions were prolific, as such it was the best place to learn.”

After three years, Jones decided to make the move from the sellside to buyside in order to assess companies over a longer time horizon. It also allowed her to sharpen her financial analyst acumen as well as learn a new skill – the art of management. However, she wanted to stay in the high yield and loan space because of their constantly changing and stimulating nature.

Oaktree was a perfect fit because at the time -2003- it was a pioneer in European high yield and “a great place to learn the skills of credit investment,” she says. Jones further enhanced her education by studying in the evening and weekends for the rigorous chartered financial analyst qualification.

Seventeen years later and Jones is still learning and being challenged., She is also looking to bolster and develop her team which numbers nine investment professionals. “We continued hiring through the pandemic because we do not want to wake up and be surprised by a lack of resources,” she adds. “We know that the economic conditions will be difficult, so we want to make sure that we have the depth of skills to analyse companies.”

While talent is a criterion in the recruitment process, Jones is also looking for people who are not afraid to debate and discuss. She sees her job as unlocking potential and encouraging people to air their views even if it means going against “group think.”

Not surprisingly, creating a collegiate environment is not that easy in a remote working environment. “We are used to seeing each other in person and sharing information and exchanging ideas,” she says. “When lockdown happened, we had to replicate this to the best of our ability. As a firm, we made sure that we had the communication processes and connectivity that allowed the free flow of information across teams and geographies. Human capital is our greatest asset and we made sure that our employees were well supported in every way when lockdown happened.”

When government guidance allows, the office is open. It is up to individuals to return or not, and Jones believes that flexible working arrangements will be one of the long-term outcomes of lockdown. “If we get this right, then I think this could be beneficial for the diversity agenda, before, people were not totally comfortable with virtual communication platforms. Covid-19 has accelerated the technology shift.”

Oaktree in general has been at the forefront of fostering diversity and inclusion. There are several different layers across the firm, ranging from awareness and outreach programmes to mentorships, recruitment initiatives, internships as well as informal networks where staff can congregate and engage.

Jones, who has been heavily involved as head of the EMEA branch of the firm’s diversity and inclusion committee, notes they take a holistic view that not only encompasses gender but also other disadvantaged groups who are underrepresented in the industry.

“The Black Lives Matter protests allowed more light to be shed on the fact that there are other significantly underrepresented groups of people in financial services,” she adds. “There is a clear step change in awareness and dialogue. However, it is about more than just recruitment, but also retention. We need to invest in and develop career pathways for groups who have not had them in the past.”

©BestExecution 2020

 

 

 

 

 

TriOptima and AcadiaSoft extend partnership for collateral solution

Neil Murphy, business manager at TriOptima.
Neil Murphy, business manager at TriOptima.

TriOptima, which is part of CME Group, has extended its collaboration with AcadiaSoft to automate monthly collateral interest payments, making trade processing more efficient for over-the-counter (OTC) market participants.

According to International Swap Dealers Association (ISDA) data, cash collateral accounts for around 70% of all collateral exchanged for non-cleared derivatives, equivalent to $1.3 trn in 2019 alone.

The trade group says a significant chunk of this market still relies on email and manual reconciliation to manage the interest process. The expanded support for AcadiaSoft’s new payments messaging should generate greater efficiencies.

“Our clients are aiming to automate large parts of their collateral management lifecycle as they prepare for upcoming phases of the uncleared margin rules (UMR),” said Neil Murphy, business manager at TriOptima.

He added, “Enabling clients to process interest in an efficient way, that allows reconciliation of underlying balances and automated matching, is part of that process. triResolve Margin connects more than 200 counterparties to the AcadiaSoft network; hence this collaboration automatically provides the wider market with improved post-trade processing capabilities.”

Mark Demo, head of community development at AcadiaSoft, said, “It’s another step toward complete collateral process automation and will help more firms reduce the amount of time required to complete their monthly cash collateral interest process. It also builds on our goal of increased network connectivity across the industry.”

The UMR involves the mandatory exchange and segregation of initial margin (IM) on non-cleared derivatives trades.  In April, the Basel Committee and International Organisation of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) delayed the final two final implementation phases by one year due to disruptions caused by the coronavirus pandemic.

Buyside firms with derivatives of a notional value exceeding €8 bn now have until 2 September 2022 to comply while those with derivatives of a notional value exceeding €50 bn will have until 1 September 2021, one year later than originally planned.

Four years ago, TriOptima, launched post trade service, triResolve Margin, a web-based, end-to-end margin processing solution delivered in partnership with AcadiaSoft.

©BestExecution 2020

[divider_to_top]

·                 

·                 

 

 

Germany sells first ever green sovereign bond

Johann Plé, portfolio manager at AXA Investment Managers.
Johann Plé, portfolio manager at AXA Investment Managers.

Germany is selling its first ever green government bond, in a deal that is seen as a landmark step in the development of Europe’s green bond market. The hope is that it will help establish a benchmark for pricing other green transactions.

The German Treasury attracted more than €30bn of bids for up to €6bn of 10-year debt. The bond is being sold as a twin of its outstanding Aug 2030 bond.

This means that once the bonds have been sold, investors will be able to exchange their green bonds for the conventional equivalent at any times. The structure will mitigate any liquidity concerns that smaller, less liquid green securities would trade at a lower price.

The ministry will seek to ensure the price of the green twin is always at least that of the conventional bond, by purchasing green bonds if it falls below that level.

Market participants will be closely looking at the yield which is expected to be around minus 0.45% – similar to the one on its mainstream twin.

Overall, Germany is expected to issue up to €12bn this year, across a range of maturities from two to 30 years.

In general, green bonds have enjoyed a surge of interest in recent years, as investing in environmental, social and governance  linked securities has gained momentum in fund management circles.  Figures from Moody’s shows that a total of $263bn of this type of debt was sold last year, up from less than $1bn a decade ago.

“The green bond market was already in the ascendency, with issuance growing annually in recent years, but the move by Germany to issue its first ever green bond could open the floodgates,” says Johann Plé, portfolio manager at AXA Investment Managers.

He adds “the current rate of issuance – there is expected to be around $200bn of green bonds issued in 2020 – is going to look small compared to the growth we will see in the next few years, especially as sovereigns enter the market, “As such, we think the overall market size could grow to $1trn by the end of 2021, but it will still only account for a small percentage of the overall debt markets, so it truly is at the start of its journey.

“If you see a Biden presidency, and if other governments follow Germany and Sweden’s moves to launch green government bonds, we expect it to really take-off,”  says Plé.

©BestExecution 2020

[divider_to_top]

 

Defining Markets with the Power of Data and Analytics

Catherine Clay, Cboe

With Catherine Clay, Senior Vice President and Global Head of Information Solutions at Cboe

The first half of 2020 has been a stunning period in history, with a global pandemic threatening lives, markets and economies. The resulting market uncertainty illustrated that the need to understand risk has never been more important. As investors sought tools to help navigate this challenging environment, the demand for robust datasets and sophisticated analytics soared. This desire for more market intelligence, although heightened during the crisis, is not new — it is a continued and increasing demand for augmented analytics that has been building over time. And, it is a need Cboe Global Markets identified and sought to address beginning several years ago. 

Cboe Information Solutions’ comprehensive product suite of data, analytics, indices and execution services arms market participants with a wide variety of solutions that can simplify the complexities of navigating the derivatives marketplace. This extensive offering is designed to optimize the customer experience throughout the life cycle of a transaction, from pre-trade to at-trade to post-trade, by providing insights, alpha opportunities, portfolio optimizations and seamless workflows. 

“Cboe’s ethos is a deeply held belief that market participants and investors at all levels benefit from asset price stability, protection of principal and capital growth,” said Catherine Clay, Senior Vice President and Global Head of Information Solutions at Cboe. “We’re listening to our customers and providing them with a comprehensive suite of data solutions, analytics and indices, that help them better understand risk and access markets.”

Providing Flexible Solutions 

Catherine Clay, Cboe

Cboe Information Solutions is a result of several strategic acquisitions: LiveVol and DataShop in 2015, Silexx in 2017, and its 2020 hat trick — Hanweck, FT Options and Trade Alert, in addition to its existing Cboe Global Indices business. 

“Each of the acquired firms were best-in-breed companies and collectively, make our Information Solutions offering second to none. We’ve strategically built this team to be able to help our clients gain market insights and better understand their portfolio risk in real-time to ultimately drive better-informed, more confident trading decisions,” Clay said. “Information Solutions’ holistic offering provides transparency, access and ease to customers.” 

“The opaque, inefficient, slow and fragmented workflow that our clients are subjected to is really what drove us to build Information Solutions,” Clay said. “In essence, we created a ‘dream team’ of quantitative, technical and business expertise. Our products reflect this amazing talent and our shared vision about why what we do matters. And our team is highly talented in building information solutions by addressing the pain points clients experience throughout the life cycle of their trades.”

Faster Market Intelligence 

In today’s modern trading environment, speed is king. And one of the greatest challenges for market participants is receiving powerful analytics in as close to real-time as possible. This includes a major shift away from end-of-day analytics, to a much more real-time analytics environment where users are notified of market activity and order flow dynamics relevant to their business. 

And certainly, 2020 has presented its own unique data challenges for trading and investing firms. Chief among them that the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has dispersed employees to their homes, which caused the vital information flow found on a live trading desk to evaporate. By supplementing an exchange floor experience, Trade Alert’s system is able to fill a critical communications gap that would have otherwise been lost while working from home.

“This drastic shift posed a new opportunity for us, as our platforms were uniquely designed to fill the void created by a remote working environment,” Clay said. “Our platforms help clients understand real-time market color and intelligence through a digital interface. Our acquisition of Trade Alert in June really hits on this point.” 

 Clay also cited trading and investment firms’ immense ongoing headache of data storage and management, plus constraints around access to and quality of data in some markets. Many market participants have various solutions from different vendors layered on top of their own in-house-solutions, which can make for a fragmented, inefficient and slow workflow. Cboe Information Solutions aims to stitch that all together with its complete offering. 

Building for the Future

Going forward, the Cboe Information Solutions team has ambitious plans. “We intend to continue integrating our products and technology stack, with the end goal of expanding our distribution — both across our current client base and globally,” Clay said. 

To harmonize its data and analytics offerings, Information Solutions plans to introduce the Cboe Theoretical Value, or “Cboe Theo,” a necessary step toward achieving a cohesive dataset. This theoretical price is valuable to the end-user as it provides a fair value before trading derivatives, as well as for strategy analysis post-execution. The exchange operator expects to complete what it describes as one of the most foundational data points by the end of September.

“We are on a mission to impact the outcomes in the market for all participants,” Clay concluded. “The capital markets demand greater innovation and solutions that better serve market participants, and 2020 has only accelerated the need to access data and analytics in easier and better ways to ultimately share information more seamlessly. Our team goes to work each day with that ethos.”

Cboe Information Solutions’ holistic offering includes:

  • Trade Alert delivers timely, accurate flow analysis including directional sweep and complex order aggregation, unusual volume alerts, expert commentary, historical data and more.
  • Cboe Hanweck provides margin-risk analytics with a real-time, data-enabled, global, cross-asset, risk-analytics platform.
  • FT Options combines risk and volatility analytics into a premier portfolio-management platform with what-if scenarios and attribution models.
  • Cboe Silexx Order Execution Management System (OEMS) provides broker-neutral access, along with robust risk management features and FLEX options trading.
  • Cboe LiveVol provides aggregated equity and derivative market statistics, live vs. historical implied volatilities, trading indicators, alerts and visualizations delivered in both a desktop platform and Application Programming Interfaces (APIs).
  • Cboe DataShop offers the purchase and delivery of historical and subscription market and reference data in a one-stop shop. Data sets are derived from multiple trading venues and asset classes and are packaged for easy download.
  • Cboe Global Indices offers independent index calculation services with real-time distribution channels, as well as development of option strategy benchmarks for licensing. Cboe’s proprietary strategy benchmarks include the Cboe Volatility Index® (VIX Index®), BuyWrite and PutWrite indices, and Target Outcome indices.

For more information, visit Cboe.com/ISG

Technical Analysis in a COVID-19 Market

Phil DeFrancesco, Refinitiv

With Phil DeFrancesco, Global Head of Equity Trading, Refinitiv

How has the trader’s approach to the market changed amid COVID-19?

Phil DeFrancesco, Refinitiv

COVID-19 has completely thrown trading desks on their heads. First, traders have had to work remotely and maybe adopt new technology, and they’ve had to do this pretty much overnight, whereas in the past it would have taken years to implement. Second, traders have had to deal with extraordinary market volatility. 

This volatility can be seen as a double-edged sword. But what it does do is present more short-term trading opportunities for traders to act on. Equity markets have behaved very irrationally, and it is very difficult to make sense of some of these sudden upside or downside stock price movements. One day, there is what we call a ‘dash for trash’, as investors look to scoop up companies that are out of favor due to COVID-19. The next day, the market rolls over on fears of a second wave of the virus, and the next day, it pops because there’s hope for a vaccine. And then the cycle repeats. 

This level of uncertainty and volatility in the markets is a playground for the short-term trader.

What role can technical analysis play in navigating the uncertainty of today’s trading environment?

The idea that the S&P 500, which is valued on discounted future corporate profits, is positive for the year, seems absurd. On August 18, the S&P closed at an all-time high. People who trade solely on fundamentals must be having fits. Given the volatility we have seen in 2020, it is no surprise that data shows long-only has been one of the worst trading strategies year-to-date.

In times like these, one cannot underestimate the power of market sentiment, as it influences the technical indicators traders use to make decisions, and it is the crux of what technical analysis feeds on. 

There’s an old Wall Street term, “The trend is your friend,” which suggests investors take advantage of existing trends. Now, predicting market trends in advance is tricky business. Identifying existing trends and riding that wave could increase the odds of making a profit, but the key is being able to identify those existing trends — this is where technical analysis comes in. Examples of technical indicators that seasoned traders use to identify trends are a stock’s moving average; its trading volume; its relative strength index (RSI); and its moving average convergence divergence (MACD). Traders will often use a combination of indicators to capture gains through this analysis of a security’s momentum. Traders and portfolio managers can also use technical analysis to identify favorable entry and exit points for potential trades.

What data, analytics and other tools does Refinitiv leverage to support clients who use technical analysis in their trading?

Refinitiv’s flagship desktop product Eikon provides state-of-the-art charting capabilities, which traders and portfolio managers can use to easily perform technical analysis. Eikon is equipped with hundreds of the most widely used indicators, and its charting capabilities allow traders to mark up charts to help identify trends and patterns. 

Refinitiv also partners with vendors including Tradesignal and MetaStock to bolster our offerings in this space. MetaStock, has been a tremendous partner of ours for almost a decade, and our partnership allows our users to take their technical analysis skills to another level by creating their own scenarios. The MetaStock Pro for Eikon, which is an add-on for Eikon, has an easy to use, built-in language for creating and writing strategies. The solution also offers backtesting and optimization capabilities, along with the ability to create sophisticated alerts, such as automated buy and sell alerts. The MetaStock Pro for Eikon solution even offers an advanced tool for forecasting future direction based on past technical criteria.

What are a few examples of technical analysis working for traders this year? 

 The 200 simple moving average (SMA) has been a big support for the Dow over the last year (Figure 1). It has often reverted to the mean. Typically, a break below a support level will show a short- to mid-term drop. When Covid-19 hit, it broke through the support and tried to revert to the mean; it then used it as resistance and didn’t have the strength to push through. That is when we saw the big drop. After a rebound, it entered a period of indecision around the 200 SMA. 

Figure 1

Another example (Figure 2) is Walmart (WMT), a stock that has had a surge in trading during the pandemic. It also is very interesting based on the Fibonacci retracements. The major theme with Walmart is that it has a major retracement line around the 118 price. This price has been a key level since September 2019. In April 2020, the price surged past 118, then retraced back to this Fibonacci level. The April move higher could be seen as a precursor to the price reverting back to the 118 level, based on the pattern of the past two years, which shows that Walmart has used retracement levels as key support and resistance levels. 

Figure 2

Fast forward to whenever the COVID-19 market is fully over, in six months or one year or two years. What do you see as the key themes regarding technical analysis at that time? 

Technical analysis has been a very important tool for traders for a long time and there has always been a bit of a love/hate relationship between fundamental analysis and technical analysis.

But, there is a middle ground. Can you use technical analysis even if you primarily look at the fundamentals of a company? In the past, I think you belonged in one of the two camps — either you’re a fundamental analyst, or you’re a technical analyst. Some fundamental analysts would even consider technical analysis sort of a self-fulfilling prophecy.

There may be some more appreciation for technical analysis by the broader investment community, in the post-COVID-19 world. Technical analysis can help paint a clearer picture of the overall market sentiment and what’s happening out there. Sometimes, the market, or an individual security, doesn’t move in a way that you had anticipated, but that doesn’t mean you can’t find alpha there. So when the dust settles and everyone goes back to “normal”, I think there’s going to be a greater appreciation for what technical analysis can bring to your overall investing approach.

Data and Quant Models in Emerging Markets Equity Trading

George Molina, Franklin Templeton

With George Molina, Head of EME Trading, and Kevin Ngan, Quantitative Trader, Franklin Templeton

What is the state of play for using data and quantitative models in emerging markets equity trading? How has this evolved?

George Molina, Franklin Templeton

The industry has been adapting to automation progressively in the last few years within emerging markets, and the use of algo products such as sell-side algo suites and algo wheels has increased dramatically. The rise of unconstrained algos has created vast volumes of data and more opportunities to leverage data science in trading. 

Traditionally, strategies are executed using a trader’s extensive trading experience and market knowledge. As data continues to play a more prominent role, statistical analysis is gaining influence on the modern trading desk. As a desk’s culture slowly gravitates towards a more data-driven and scientific approach, its strategies are constantly challenged and supported by adequate back-testing and hypothesis testing. As a result, buy-side firms have started to seek additional quantitative talents, most often a hybrid between a traditional trader and a quantitative researcher, who can draw actionable insights from millions of noisy data points and maintain a set of quantitative models. On the systems side, there has been advancement in third-party technology, particularly in EMS [execution management system] and TCA [transaction cost analysis] data APIs [application programming interfaces], where it helps to significantly boost research efficiency and the capability to deploy quantitative models in production.

How does low touch in EM equity trading differ from doing the same in developed markets equity trading? What are the unique challenges in EM?

Kevin Ngan, Franklin Templeton

Fundamentally, DM and EM have different areas of interests in terms of execution alpha. DM focuses more on alternative venue analysis and child order routing, and venue toxicity has a greater influence in realized market impact cost. While there are only a handful of dark pools available in EM, the diversity in market microstructure is a more significant factor in post-trade analysis, as each country has its own market characteristics and liquidity profile. One common pitfall is to have a single blanket execution strategy for a whole region, or a series of independent strategies for each country and benchmark; in both cases, a typical buy-side firm will quickly run into a data sampling problem and fail to obtain meaningful results even with years of execution data. Hence, knowing how to reduce dimensions while maintaining statistical significance with enough data points is one of the crucial questions that should be answered with an algo wheel setup.

Another interesting challenge within EM is how far automation can go before sacrificing execution performance. At present, humans are still the center of trading in the region, and algos tend to underperform manual trading in bigger ADV bands, especially in markets where blocks contribute to a big proportion of available liquidity. Ultimately, the sweet spot on the automation spectrum depends on the flow characteristics of the firm, and it is important to maintain excellent and consistent execution qualities.

Does Franklin Templeton use data and quant models in EM equity trading as a differentiator / competitive advantage vis a vis other institutional buy sides? 

Rather than viewing data and quant models as a standalone tool, our desk seeks to integrate them into the trading process as much as possible. Data itself is only one part of the equation; a full cycle involves experiments design, data collection, data cleaning, statistical inference/machine learning, model development, and live production. Although the process could be highly quantitative, choosing the correct objective function is a work of art and hugely relies on market expertise, especially for high-touch models where traditional TCA is not the only metric to evaluate routing destinations.

This framework encourages idea generation across the whole team, and allows traders to challenge existing methodologies and fine-tune any parameters. As a result, the team is better equipped to react to market inefficiencies and deliver best execution and client service. The desk has also been constantly engaging with sell side and vendors in leveraging their quantitative resources. It is important to keep an open mind and understand the latest developments, in order to test and apply any relevant ideas into our workflow.

As the industry continues to evolve with an ever more complicated regulatory landscape and higher expectations, a culture of innovation and embracing technological change is vital to drive the success of the buy-side trading desk.

Where is EM equity trading on the spectrum of high touch to low touch? Is it moving towards low touch? Are you seeing a convergence of high touch and low touch?

The share of algorithmic trading in Asia is catching up with Europe and the U.S. At Franklin Templeton, the percentage of algo flow has doubled in the last two years in Asia. Since the introduction of the algo wheel, execution quants are able to design scientific experiments to identify the optimal parameters and conduct broker reviews through statistical inference; this provides a level of confidence among traders and thus selectively moves some flow from high touch to low touch.

Nonetheless, low touch is by no means a substitute of high touch. Each has their pros and cons, especially in Asia. Although the advancement of data and technology will further increase the share of algo trading in the region, there is a cap on how far this can go. This cap will depend on the type of flow and the expected market impact cost. For example, the IOI ecosystem offers sizable liquidity; combined with sensible analysis and scoring, the realized high-touch market impact cost will outperform that of low touch, particularly during times of heightened volatility and spread regimes, as was seen in March 2020.

Overall, high touch is slowly converging toward low touch; equilibrium will be reached when buy-side firms figure out their best order profiling.

What is the future of artificial intelligence and automation in EM?

Going forward, there will be more attention towards the integration of data and high-touch trading. For every small yet crucial manual routing decision, a machine learning model is able to look at historical data and immediately provide suggestions to traders. This could be IOI destinations, broker selection, crossing size and frequencies, etc. 

As a traditional asset manager, the human element in trading will still play an important role in Franklin Templeton’s future; with best execution for our clients in mind, the human overlay has proven to be an excellent complement to quantitative models.



Women in Finance Q&A

With Denny Thomas, COO India, HSBC Global Asset Management

Briefly discuss your career path starting when you decided to pursue finance as a career? 

Denny Thomas, HSBC Asset Management

As a law graduate, I started my career two decades ago, moving from a small town in India to Mumbai, the commercial capital of India. Initially, I wanted to make a career with a leading FMCG [fast-moving consumer goods company].    I wasn’t actually keen about financial services or finance as a career, it didn’t seem very exciting.

 However, fate intervened and I started as a management trainee with an investment management company and today I am in the 20th year of my career. I am so happy to have gotten that start as I have had so many various roles from compliance, legal, secretarial, risk and control to now a COO.

What has been your experience as a woman in what is an often male-dominated field? Have there been particular challenges (and/or opportunities) along the way? 

 There is no denying that even today financial services continues to be a male-dominated industry. However, when I reflect on my journey this was never the real challenge for me. I was fortunate to have been in the right place with the right people. For me, the real challenges were (and continue to be) self-inflicted ones like hesitation in putting myself forward, and looking at roles/opportunities and focusing on the things I can’t do rather than the things I can do.

 I think this is a very common female trait. Women tend to feel they need to master all the requirements before putting themselves forward. Men are more confident in this area. Fortunately, I have had colleagues and seniors who have believed in me and pushed me forward.

Have any mentors/bosses been most influential for you?

Absolutely! I have had great bosses and mentors who have had a hugely positive influence in my learning and growth. They have equipped me with the right tools and support to succeed, and challenged and pushed me to grow. 

 Having the right boss can be life-changing, especially as you can’t choose your boss. Your mentor is up to you, so it is worth spending the time and effort to find the right one.

 Key areas that my bosses and mentors have influenced me on is how to relate to different kinds of people, developing my emotional intelligence, and showing me how to take risks and become solution-oriented.

Are there notable differences in being a woman in finance at the senior level compared with the junior/middle level?

At the entry or junior level, you focus on understanding and delivering on the job, adapting to the work culture, and figuring out what is the right place for you professionally and personally. 

 At the middle level, challenges are more around finding career progression opportunities and overcoming the dilemma or guilt of personal/family responsibilities vis-à-vis career aspirations.

 At the senior level, the stakes grow much higher — performance benchmarks are steep, and here you are actually operating in a highly male-dominated setup. So you need to be mentally tough and unapologetically work your way through to deliver on your role successfully. 

What are the challenges/opportunities for women in finance in Asia compared with other regions of the world? 

 The challenges in Asia are the grueling hours and a more male-dominated management culture. If you are a woman aspiring to have a career in financial services, you need mental strength and readiness and be unapologetic in overcoming any obstacles from people trying to deter you. 

 The region has large economies like China, Japan and India. Hong Kong is a major financial services hub with many companies locating their regional headquarters there. 

 However, all these countries are still a long way off from achieving gender diversity. There is some good work going on to improve women representation in senior and leadership roles, but not enough generally. There is real scope for women to make successful careers in FS and raise their economic contribution and role in the region.

How is HSBC in terms of supporting and encouraging its women employees?

In my 20-year career, HSBC has been my employer for 10 years. This is the longest that I have worked with one organisation. This in itself is testament to how supportive and encouraging HSBC is, not just for women employees, but for employees in general. 

 HSBC has actively invested in my leadership development and this has helped me immensely. I have seen at the senior-most levels at HSBC, an absolute acceptance of the need to have diversity at all levels and the adverse impact on business if this need is not met.

 This acceptance has led to greater levels of awareness which in turn has translated into efforts and actions. For gender diversity, the group has put in a lot of thought and I have seen many policy changes to support women employees from not dropping out and seen targeted programs to identify potential women talent followed by invigorating interventions to help develop their leadership skills.

I also like the way in which HSBC presents its women leaders as role models and arranges regular engagement opportunities with staff. This in my view really helps potential women talent see what the future could look like for them and encourages them to pursue their aspirations with more confidence and faith.

How do you strike a work/life balance?

For me getting the right work-life balance has been an ever-evolving journey. Over time I discovered that it’s a blend of science and art and to be efficient and effective, and it’s an absolute must for me to have control over my time. 

 Clarity on priorities, meticulous planning, uninterrupted focus, disciplined execution, ability to say no, some self-imposed rules on working hours, blocking self-time, multitasking, delegation and attention to quality rather than quantity have been the key tools for me to get the work-life balance right, and these are non-negotiable. 

 I tend to work best in the morning and tend to try to get the difficult things out of the way first.

 Family is a good de-stresser and I don’t take my work home. Sometimes, if you have a problem, sleep on it, your unconscious mind will figure out the problem and the solution often presents itself the next day.

What is your advice for a young woman considering a career or just starting out in finance?

 Challenge the cultural legacies related to the role of men and women in society and in the workplace, as they create barriers for you and give you less time to pursue your career aspirations. Work your way through to knock these barriers down.

 Expose yourself to tough problems and crisis situations. Go through the struggles of being able to solve them. Each struggle will give you a sense of growth and the ability to realise your real potential. 

 Expect more! Expect equal opportunities; expect openness and transparency; expect stretch assignments and challenges; ask for what you want.

 Find a sponsor for yourself to support and guide you in your career growth and consciously put in time and effort to build your network.

Most importantly, never give up, be resilient. As someone once said, “When everything feels like an uphill struggle, just think of the view from top.”

What is the future of women in finance? What progress is still needed?

 The progress of women in the workforce generally and specifically in financial services has been painfully slow, but the good news is that progress has been steady and has gained some noticeable momentum in the last five years. The future of women is most definitely bright and promising in financial services. 

However, a lot needs to be done starting from addressing common issues like inclusion and equality in the workplace, sponsorship and advocacy of women candidates, acceptance of remote/flexible working, and under-representation of women in leadership roles. There needs to be more widespread cultural transformation where organizations don’t just consider gender diversity as ‘the right thing’ to do, but as a strategic advantage and necessity. 

 Also a lot of thought and targeted effort is required for women at the middle levels, as that’s where a significant drop-out occurs, opening up a significant gap in the gender ratio and making it really difficult to improve the count of women in leadership roles.

Post COVID-19: What Next for ESG?

Rebecca Healey, FIX Trading Community

By Rebecca Healey, Co-Chair EMEA Regional Committee & EMEA Regulatory Subcommittee, FIX Trading Community

Rebecca Healey, FIX Trading Community

ESG is no longer a fringe concept. A year ago it was highlighted that more than 70% of investment firms had a commitment to incorporate ESG across all investment products – the rising pandemic along with the Black Lives Matter movement is propelling not only the E but also the S and the G now into mainstream investing; global ESG funds saw their highest inflows on record in July1. Moving ESG from a stand-alone niche product to centre stage in the investment will create challenges but also offers opportunity for the industry. From changes in research consumption to shifts in liquidity formation, as sectors fall in or out of favour; as well as the need for increased governance to avoid rising regulatory concern over greenwashing — data to monitor, effectively risk assess benchmark and reporting ESG will be critical to the industry’s future success. 

The recent campaign by Richard Curtis – “Make My Money Matter”2 raises the scale of the challenge. There is £3 trillion invested in UK pension funds alone, and while end investors can choose where to invest, there is not yet the capacity in ethical funds to house all pension money. Managing the transition into sustainable finance will require a change in approach to investments through the digitisation of the investment process itself. Simply because investments are ethical doesn’t mean that the underlying companies are outperforming the norm. While ethical funds have outperformed in the downturn, this may not be based on the performance of these companies, but rather on a supply and demand boost where interest in the companies is inflating their value, which will correct itself in time.

Take the recent case of Wirecard – according to Bloomberg, 10 out of 25 analysts covering Wirecard had buy ratings on the stock as late as 18 June, the day auditors revealed that €1.9bn was missing from the firm’s balance sheet. In addition, Moral Money claims that before its collapse, Wirecard earned median-grade ESG ratings from MSCI and Sustainalytics, but not from all data providers. The myriad of conflicting ratings didn’t prevent Wirecard from being selected by some large ESG exchange traded funds which incurred losses as a result. As it stands today ESG ratings can be very subjective and there is a risk in just taking the base level rating rather than seeing it in context and conducting full due diligence – the G of ESG. 

There is a legitimate argument that there can be no one-size fits all ESG strategy, however information overload will make it challenging, if not impossible, to read through the noise and hone in on what matters. Sustainable investing requires a variety of criteria to be taken into consideration ahead of an investment decision. To facilitate greater adoption of ESG in mainstream investments, new specialist research, data and analytics offerings are emerging to provide improved means of aggregating and quantifying information to identify future successful ESG and RI investments.

 With Covid-19 hastening widespread adoption of ESG, the challenge for asset managers is not only the complexity of ESG as an investment strategy, but the increasing possibility of conflicting regulation. The SEC plans to lead on disclosure of ESG—“If the SEC does not take the lead, it is highly likely that other jurisdictions will impose standards in the next few years that US Issuers will be bound to follow3.” The European Commission is also implementing a new regulatory framework and taxonomy to ensure climate and environmental risks are fully managed and integrated into the financial system4. In APAC, regulators have produced a stewardship code and third-party conformity assessments on green funds5, all of which suggests future challenges for global firms planning to adhere to multiple regulators in an already evolving and complex landscape. If the issue in the past has been on the scarcity and collation of accurate data to extract value, managing this with rising investor interest, as well as, a conflicting global regulatory framework makes it critical for the industry to come together to assess what is required and how to best to deliver sufficient global standards to cover the different methodologies of ESG. 

 The FIX Trading Community, as an industry standards association, plans to take a key role in fostering the debate to ensure improved standardisation of ESG data and to propose industry best practices to incorporate that data. To that end, join us for the virtual debate on 18th September “ESG is No a longer a Fringe Concept” – Sustainable Investing Post COVID-19 – What is the impact on Asset Management? 

[1] https://www.internationalinvestment.net/news/4018930/global-esg-funds-inflows-record

[1] https://www.independent.co.uk/independentpremium/voices/pension-funds-money-invested-ethical-portfolios-coronavirus-economy-a9591876.html

[1] https://www.sec.gov/spotlight/investor-advisory-committee-2012/recommendation-of-the-investor-as-owner-subcommittee-on-esg-disclosure.pdf

4 https://ec.europa.eu/info/consultations/finance-2020-sustainable-finance-strategy_en

5 https://www.news.gov.hk/eng/2019/09/20190925/20190925_170312_723.html



Further delay to SDR due to Covid-19

The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has confirmed it will further delay the implementation of the Central Securities Depositories Regulation (CSDR) settlement discipline regime (SDR) until 1 February 2022 due to Covid-19.

In its final report on draft regulatory technical standards (RTS), the European regulator highlighted the “severe impact” of the ongoing  pandemic on the overall deployment of regulatory and IT projects by central securities depositories (CSDs) and their participants as well as by other financial market infrastructures.

ESMA noted it would be “extremely difficult” for market stakeholders to comply with the requirements of the RTS on settlement discipline by 1 February 2021.

This RTS covers measures to prevent and address settlement fails including rules for the trade allocation and confirmation process; cash penalties on failed transactions; mandatory buy-ins; and monitoring and reporting of settlement fails.

The move was mooted in July by ESMA who said it was working on a proposal for a possible additional delay. This was partly due to persistent lobbying efforts by industry groups who have repeatedly voiced concerns regarding the mandatory buy-in regime.

Their main concerns are that this would significantly damage market liquidity and the participants it is meant to protect.

In fact, intense lobbying led to the extension of a delay even before the virus took hold. Earlier in the year, the watchdog moved the deadline by six months to 1 February 2021 after it received a collective letter from several trade groups calling for a phased in approach to SDR.

The Association for Financial Markets in Europe (AFME), the Investment Association (IA), the International Capital Market Association (ICMA), the Alternative Investment Management Association (AIMA), and the International Securities Lending Association (ISLA) among others, wrote, asking for more time to make the necessary IT system changes, to develop and update the relevant ISO messages, and to incorporate the legal arrangements.

If all goes according to the current plan, the RTS will be endorsed by the European Commission and then subject to  the non-objection of the European Parliament and of the European Council.

©BestExecution 2020

Clearinghouse reform : Safe and sound?

Heather McKenzie assesses the robustness of CCPs and the industry’s calls to strengthen them further.

More than a decade after the global financial crisis, the consequences of that dramatic event are still being played out in the financial markets. In the aftermath, power shifted towards regulators and central banks, while financial institutions bore the brunt of the regulatory requirements that were rushed in.

Among the ‘winners’ from the crisis were central counterparties (CCPs), which emerged unscathed. They took around four days to unravel the mess left by the Lehman Brothers default while other entities took up to seven years. With the exception of the clearing member default at Nasdaq Clearing in September 2018, they have continued to thrive.

However, not everyone is happy. In March, a group of banks threw their weight behind a paper calling for regulatory action to make clearing houses ‘safer’. The paper, A Path Forward for CCP Resilience, Recovery and Resolution, was originally published in October 2019. Among the nine original backers were JP Morgan, Societe Generale, Citi, Allianz, and BlackRock. In March they were joined by others including Commonwealth Bank of Australia, Deutsche Bank, ABN Amro Clearing, UBS and Guardian Life.

The paper calls for the “further enhancement of the safety and soundness of CCPs”. Its recommendations include ensuring that CCPs are subject to appropriate risk management standards and requiring them to make material contributions of their own capital to the default waterfall in two separate tranches. It also calls for the introduction of a clearing member ballot to support CCP recovery as well as compensation to be provided to clearing members and end-users for losses incurred through recovery or resolution tools.

In addition, the checklist includes pre-defined assessment rights capped at one time each clearing member’s default fund contribution and to require CCPs to set aside ex ante resources (such as long-term debt that could be bailed in) for recapitalisation. Last but certainly not least they are asking for regular reviews of CCP rulebooks to be conducted by resolution authorities in conjunction with CCP primary regulators and systemic risk regulators to ensure a common understanding of CCP risk.

“The recommendations help to align the incentives of clients, clearing members and CCPs and to strengthen financial markets stability,” said Gert Ellerkmann, global risk governance and strategy specialist at ABN AMRO Clearing Bank, in March.

Atanas Goranov, derivatives risk officer at The Guardian Life Insurance Company of America added that while central clearing had made the derivatives market more stable, it had also increased dependence on central clearing counterparties and created a concentration of risk.

 

The concept that CCPs issue long-term debt that could be bailed-in for recapitalisation would transform CCPs into risk-taking institutions, says Karolina Ziółkowska, Head of International Co-operation, Projects, and Analysis Section at Poland’s KDPW_CCP. This would not be right.

Virginie O’Shea, post-trade fintech analyst and founder of Firebrand Research, says by forcing CCPs to put more money into default funds, the number of clearers in the market may fall further. “This would up the concentration risk and cause more issues. There aren’t enough clearers in certain markets as it is, so this would make things worse. A careful balance needs to be achieved that shares financial responsibility fairly among all entities.”

A call for action

The report urges regulators to take more action: “It is important to remember that most CCPs have for-profit ownership structures that do not in and of themselves provide the incentives necessary to proceed down this path unassisted; hence, regulatory action on this front is needed. These recommendations are intended to ensure that clearing members’ and end users’ exposures and liabilities to the CCP are limited, ascertainable and manageable. To this end, globally consistent, clear, and transparent rules to resolve the unaddressed issues will provide greater certainty for market participants, particularly in times of stress.”

Regulators have been tweaking the rules that govern CCPs, with the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) being given a strengthened role in the authorisation and supervision of CCPs in the EU via the EMIR 2.2 regulation. The regulation promotes ‘supervisory convergence’ among national competent authorities and entrusts ESMA with direct supervision of systemically important third-country CCPs (those that are established in non-EEA countries).

“In terms of the CCPs’ regulations regarding resilience, the European CCPs have been very well and strictly regulated for many years now, especially through EMIR,” says Ziółkowska. “As a jurisdiction, the EU is subject to the most stringent rules globally in this area, so we do not think there is a need for more regulation at the European level. What is needed is to create a level playing field globally.”

O’Shea observes that the paper “covers ground we have debated year in, year out for the past decade and a bit. It’s a bit like pass the risk parcel – who pays for what?” The challenge for the industry, she adds, will be what the regulators take from the paper. “EU regulators have been less keen on lobbying but do ask for market feedback, so it will depend on how they view these proposals. Politics always gets in the way!”

David Feltes, head of financial markets infrastructure at Capco, says the industry needs to learn from the “close call” it had with Nasdaq Clearing in 2018.

“In that sense, I agree with many of the proposals in the report, particularly around transparency, standards, audit, disclosure and alignment with jurisdictions across the globe.”

A significant motivation for the banks that have backed the paper is the defence of their fee income; with calls for more instruments to be brought under the central clearing umbrella, banks do not want to lose out like they did with credit default swaps (CDS) and interest rate swaps. “Since 2008, exchanges and CCPs have grown into hugely profitable enterprises, outperforming the banks,” says Feltes. “It’s understandable that they are asking whether CCPs shouldn’t take on more of the risk.”

Regulators part of the solution

Feltes believes the tension between the market infrastructures and participants can best be eased by regulators. “There should be regulatory standards globally, set perhaps by IOSCO (International Organization of Securities Commissions). Regulators should look at the recommendations in the paper and assess where they are in terms of current legislation and what more needs to be done.”

O’Shea adds: “The paper makes some very sensible points about ensuring standards for risk management within CCPs are transparent and that not all instruments are suitable for clearing. The unfortunate challenge on the latter point with regulators is that there is not wholesale agreement across global regulators on what should and should not be cleared.”

A common analogy about central clearing, she adds, is that of a balloon: squeeze it at one end and the risk pops up in another area. “By forcing extremely illiquid instruments to be cleared, you push a huge amount of risk onto a CCP versus keeping it in a bilateral agreement and that is potentially dangerous to market stability.” Feltes points out that leaving it to the banks to decide which instruments are not liquid is potentially anti-competitive.

The tension between market participants and the CCPs regarding who should be responsible for ensuring and supporting financial stability is what the recovery and resolution debate is all about, says O’Shea. “Market participants feel that regulators haven’t put enough of the onus on CCPs – who they rightly point out are ‘for profit’ entities – to foot the bill for what is essentially default insurance.”

She adds that “market infrastructures tend to be viewed within regulatory spheres in a slightly different light than the average bank or broker. I wonder whether their systemic importance makes them seem less commercialised and innocuous compared to their members. The industry group is seeking to address that perceived imbalance with these recommendations, forcing CCPs to take on more responsibility.”

©BestExecution 2020

[divider_to_top]

We're Enhancing Your Experience with Smart Technology

We've updated our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy to introduce AI tools that will personalize your content, improve our market analysis, and deliver more relevant insights.These changes take effect on Aug 25, 2025.
Your data remains protected—we're simply using smart technology to serve you better. [Review Full Terms] |[Review Privacy Policy] By continuing to use our services after Aug 25, 2025, you agree to these updates.

Close the CTA