Home Blog Page 470

Nasdaq Argues for Dynamic Tick Sizes

Global exchange operator and fintech provider Nasdaq has floated the concept of dynamic tick sizing for the equities and options markets in its recently published whitepaper, entitled Intelligent Ticks: A Blueprint for a Better Tomorrow.

The proposed model, developed in conjunction with representatives from the buy-side, sell-side, and industry associations, looks to reduce odd-lot issues and long queue waits due to the one-size-fits-all penny tick increment as well as simplify market complexity and make routing decisions more consistent across tickers, according to the paper’s authors.

Under the model, listing markets would allot tickers into a half-cent, one-cent, two-cents, five-cents, ten-cents, and 25-cent per share bucket based on their average quote spread.

Phil Mackintosh, Nasdaq

“Think of it more like how indexes have large-cap, mid-cap, and small-cap stocks,” Phil Mackintosh, chief economist at Nasdaq, told Markets Media. “Let stocks qualify for tighter spreads based on how they trade. In that way, no stock is put into a bucket that makes its spread wider.”

High-priced stocks, such as Apple, would trade in one of the buckets that have a wider increment while highly liquid stocks that trade at less than $20 per share, and 80 to 90 percent of ETFs would likely trade in the half-cent bucket.

The authors also recommended that listing exchanges reevaluate each ticker’s performance at regular intervals to see if it should be moved to a bucket with a larger or smaller tick increment.

“I think that we proposed to do that every six months, but the industry might say to do it a little bit more frequently than that or to do it less frequently,” he said. “The calculation is easy enough to do. It could be set up three weeks in advance like what FTSE Russell does with its index to make sure everyone is happy with it before you implement them on the day the changes happen.”

In the case of a stock split, listing exchanges would need to reverse-engineer the ticker’s bucket assignment since it would be a promotion, he added.

The authors did not address what effect the introduction of sub-penny tick increments for highly liquid issues would have market data volumes for cash equities.

“It will be interesting to hear what the comment letters say,” said Mackintosh.

The model does not break virgin ground as other global markets already have implemented similar structures.

“Europe has intelligent ticks across a spectrum of liquidity,” he said. “Hong Kong and Japan have had intelligent ticks in the sense that they keep the spread at the same economics even as stock prices go up.”

The only difference between the proposed model and those already in production is that Nasdaq has let market forces determine in which bucket each ticker should fall.

Mackintosh was unclear on what the proposal’s next step would be.

“This is not specifically a rule filing, but I do hope that the industry takes it up and considers it seriously,” he said. “I think there’s a fair bit of consensus that this will fix a lot of the tradability problems we have in the market right now.”

Fintech at 50

In 1969, man walked on the moon, but the U.S. stock market was closed for business one day per week to manage paperwork.

In 2019, buy and sell orders execute in nanoseconds and the entire trade life cycle is electronic.

The evolution of financial technology has been perhaps the biggest theme in the capital markets business over the past half-century, as the landscape has tectonically shifted from a hodgepodge of antiquated, manual processes, to a screen-based system with efficiency, transparency and speed that traders of yore could only dream about.

Richard Sylla, NYU Stern

“Fifty years ago New York Stock Exchange technology was still traders and brokers running around on the floor with paper slips, making trades and clearing them,” said Richard Sylla, Professor Emeritus at NYU Stern School of Business. “They actually had to reduce the hours of the exchange just to catch up.”

“Back then, before the widespread use of computer technology, a big trading day was 10 milion shares,” Sylla noted. “Fast forward to today, they trade 10 million shares in the first few minutes at the open.”

In 1969, the New York Mets won the World Series, Richard Nixon was in the first year of his presidency, and buyers and sellers of stocks interacted in pretty much the same way they interacted when the exchange was founded in 1817.

“Equity markets operated on a principal basis,” said Ralston Roberts, CEO of Instinet Incorporated, the agency-model broker founded in 1969. “Members of the Exchange sat between investors, controlling price formation and discovery — not only charging trading commissions to their counterparties, but also capturing the spread between buyers and sellers.”

Opacity Ruled

Ralston Roberts, Instinet

“There was little to no transparency, no direct access to the markets or other investors, and the costs of trading were high,” Roberts continued. “Forget doing analysis on anything such as “best execution”. The market operated much as it had for over a century – as an open outcry exchange – with manual processes and long, sometimes messy settlement periods.”

But change was in the offing. Instinet’s launch as the first Electronic Communication Network was the first milestone in electronic trading. In 1971, securities dealers formed the National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotations, or NASDAQ, which posted bids and offers on an electronic bulletin board. NYSE entered the realm of electronic trading later in the decade.

The computers and pipes worked as trade enablers– it was the mindset of market participants that was the biggest hurdle. “The notion that computing technology and electronic connections might be used for exchanging orders seemed crazy to most people.”

The premise was that an anonymous buyer, communicating with an anonymous seller and with no intermediary, would establish a price and execute a trade, at a fraction of the cost of a traditional order. “But this simple interjection of a competitor to the status quo, and the rising interest in new mainframe computers began to spread across Wall Street,” Roberts said

After some time for electronic trading to find its footing in the marketplace, the 1990s saw rapid growth in online trading over the internet, and then algorithms and high-powered computing enabled rapid advances in trading speed and capacity in the 2000s and 2010s.

Specific fintech developments over the past half-century include the rise of desktop computing and financial workstations, as well as broadband and mobile communication systems; the Financial Information eXchange (FIX) protocol for electronic trading, which was first authored in 1992; and the emergence of exchange-traded funds as modern index investing vehicles. That’s according to Spencer Mindlin, Senior Analyst at Aite Group.

Less Cost, Less Risk

Spencer Mindlin, Aite

“Fintech has dramatically reduced risks and costs for the entire supply chain of capital markets,” Mindlin said. “The scale efficiencies from technological innovation have matured such that the frictional cost to trade in capital markets are nearly zero. Broadly speaking, when looking at both primary and secondary capital markets, the ease at which entrepreneurs may utilize the public market for capital formation and end investors may participate in the growth of the American economy is unparalleled.”

Instinet’s Roberts enumerated some of the fintech-driven advances of NBBO/consolidated tape; smart order routing; algo and quantitative trading; transaction cost analysis; co-location; market surveillance; and improvements in settlement and risk management.

Fintech advances over the past 50 years have boosted multiple market constituencies, ranging from exchanges to technology providers to trading firms. And perhaps the end-user investor most of all, who according to Roberts has benefitted from transparency, lower trading cost, narrower bid-ask spreads, more access to marketable liquidity, and a broader set of investment opportunities.

As for the future, while emerging technologies such as machine learning, blockchain, and cloud have gained varying degrees of traction in 2019, it remains to be seen what the next 50 years will bring in terms of transformative change.

NYU’s Sylla noted that economic history has shown that technology does not advance linearly; rather, periods of rapid advances can be followed by periods of less innovation, as the technology spreads.

Roberts and Mindlin see a robust fintech future. “The pace of innovation and adoption of new technologies seems to be accelerating, rather than leveling or decreasing,” Roberts said. “The availability of ‘big data’ and advanced computer processing has led to machine learning and AI, as well as whole new disciplines of quant research.”​

State Street and Gemini Launch Digital Asset Pilot

Digital Assets Accessible Unlock Information Concept

Digital assets may have just taken one giant leap – for investorkind.

Just today Gemini and State Street announced they were partnering to bring a digital asset pilot to the marketplace. The announcement, made via blog plot on Medium.com by Gemini Chief Executive Officer Tyler Winklevoss, said that while trading the infant asset class was a given on his exchange, the pilot would also allow financial institutions to be able to custody their digital assets with Gemini Custody and receive the reporting and holdings information for these assets via State Street.

“Working with State Street to pilot this program is a major milestone for Gemini and digital assets as a mainstream asset class,” Winklevoss said. “This joint pilot enables an institutional investor to test custody of digital assets via Gemini Custody and receive reporting for these assets via State Street using two trusted and regulated financial institutions — helping us build a better bridge to the future of money.”

This pilot will initially support the custody of bitcoin and ether at Gemini; with State Street providing the back-office reporting. However, it is extensible to other digital assets, such as tokenized securities, in the future.

Custody has often been the bane of digital asset trading – what happens once  trade has been executed, is the problem. This has been noted from a new paper from the International Securities Services Association (ISSA), produced in collaboration with market participants, including IHS Markit. This paper identifies several key areas such as settlement, regulation and risk and technology standards in which questions must be resolved before institutional-grade asset transfer and servicing can take hold in a tokenized framework. 

The Gemini/State Street offering looks to address some of these issues. According to a release from the pair, this pilot performs reporting scenarios on a user’s holdings within Gemini Custody. Initially, the pilot reports holdings of two cryptocurrencies chosen for liquidity reasons. However, it can be adapted to report on holdings of other digital assets, such as security tokens. It allows the user to consolidate the reporting of their digital assets serviced by Gemini, an independent digital asset custodian, with their traditional assets serviced by State Street.

“We want to evolve our business with our clients’ needs. The digital asset space is still nascent, yet it promises opportunities that could fundamentally impact how we do things in the future,” said Ralph Achkar, managing director, Digital Product Development & Innovation at State Street. “There is small, but growing demand from our clients for solutions of this type and many technical, operational, regulatory, and legal considerations to be addressed. That is why we have opted for an open model, and started a pilot with Gemini as an established, regulated player in the digital asset space.

Jeanine Hightower-Sellito, Managing Director, Operations at Gemini said that the union was the culmination of 18 months of due diligence and research.

“This is an amazing milestone, not only for Gemini, but for digital assets as a mainstream asset class,” she said.

Bryan Marty, CFA and Senior Associate, Capital Markets at S&P Glbal Markets Intelligence said the development was very interesting.

Lisa Seim, and Advisory Board member at MobiePay was excited to see the union and that it could mean fresh ideas for the custody and trading of digital assets.

“More and more collaboration… refreshing to see the old match with the new,” she commented on LinkedIn.

Alan Kostrinsky, advisor and Business Development Director at OpenCrowd said the announcement was indeed a positive for the digital asset market.

“Great news and another important step in adoption,” Kostrinsky said.

A Conversation with Instinet’s Ralston Roberts

A lot can happen in 50 years.

Ralston Roberts, Instinet

Especially on Wall Street. It is an understatement to say that the way securities are traded has evolved from a simple floor-trader open-outcry method to microwave transmission of data packets. A sales trader or broker wouldn’t even begin to recognize the stock market.

But one firm has managed to maintain a presence in the equities market amid the trading, turmoil, electronification, fragmentation, regulation and digitalization – Instinet. And as the broker-dealer/technology firm reflects on the last 50 years on Wall Street, its current Chief Executive Officer Ralston Roberts sat down with Traders Magazine’s John D’Antona Jr. to reminisce and discuss the last half a century of change in the equities markets.

Traders Magazine: Discuss the changes in the investment life cycle over time, including the integral role Instinet has played in advancing and shaping it (including the transition from investors needing to do everything with intermediaries to the more efficient marketplace created by Instinet).

Ralston Roberts: Fifty years ago, “price discovery” for a stock was done by asking your brokers for a quote or waiting around for information on your security to stutter out of the ticker – if you were lucky enough to have one.

There was little to no transparency, little to no protection from information leakage, little to no ability to assess a concept such as “reversion” or “best execution”.  There weren’t many choices with regard to how orders were handled. It was messy and there were many mistakes.  Position management was a difficult, manual process and often took days to determine. 

If your broker didn’t pick up your call, you were left totally uninformed. Surveillance was practically impossible.  Spreads were wide and volatility was dramatic – which is essentially the opposite of efficiency. 

The concepts we value today: transparency, efficiency, fair access, best execution, anonymity – none of these things were available before electronification. Jerry Pustilnik, Instinet’s founder and original CEO, had a vision.  It was for an electronic network for trading stocks.  This would be an alternative to the single central limit order book that was accessible to only a few people. A place for investors to connect with each other to execute trades at the best possible price, and for lower cost. 

These principles seem so basic now, but their introduction was a moment in history that would slowly, but steadily, begin a transformation.

 

TM: How has Instinet evolved during its 50 years?

Roberts: The firm has grown in headcount and scale, changed structure, ownership models, its global footprint, and our product mix has changed over time.  Interestingly, when we look back, Instinet’s evolutionary changes and significant innovations have consistently occurred just in advance of major market structure events.

Being an anticipatory organization that is willing to challenge the status quo has become part of the firm’s culture.

 

TM: Has that evolution been smooth? What were some of the “bumps” the firm has encountered?

Roberts: Evolution is a slow and gradual process. But revolution is disruptive and often messy. Instinet has seen both types of transformation over its history. 

Five decades ago, the firm began as a privately held startup. It was acquired by Reuters in 1987 – just after Black Monday and just before Order Handling Rules. It was divested and went public just as the Tech Bubble was bursting. Instinet went on to make its own acquisition of their then competitor, Island ECN. The firm divested the crossing technology – selling “INET” to Nasdaq in 2006, once again going private.  Ultimately, Nomura acquired us in 2007 just before the financial crisis of 2008. Since then, the firm created and then sold Chi-X, and more recently we acquired BlockCross. 

Dramatic changes bring a few aches and pains as the firm’s people make structural or cultural adjustments.  But they also bring the benefits of growth. If we’d attempted to stand still all these years, I don’t believe we would have remained as nimble or as relevant as we are today.

 

TM: How does Instinet fit into the 21st Century equities market structure?

Roberts: Our agency model is well suited to the evolving global market structure environment. We are designed so that our interests are aligned with those of our clients: when they succeed, we succeed. Our focus is on helping them to achieve execution quality – a very straightforward premise. 

Being agile and fully electronic gives us efficiency and scale.  Being global, broker-neutral and multi-asset means we can provide our clients with a wide array of opportunities and workflow solutions. Being big data-driven and highly quantitative, with exchange-grade technology and a multi-colocated infrastructure means we can deliver access, intelligence, speed, and transparency to clients who, rightly enough, demand ever-increasing sophistication and performance from their relationships.

 

TM: Where does Instinet fit in the technology landscape in today’s market structure? Creator of new tech? Advisor on new tech? Distributor of new tech?

Roberts: Do I have to only choose one of those?  

Here’s what I think: technology is the language we speak now. It’s not a product as much as it is a “medium”.  We provide our clients with insights and intelligence. We deliver access and aggregate liquidity. We offer execution strategies, tools and advisory. And we operate platforms that empower their workflow, so they can derive benefit from every part of the investment life cycle.

Nothing in our industry is static, change is the new constant.  So, we try to create a culture that doesn’t just react to change – our goal is to proactively make positive change happen.

What we realized as we prepared for our Fiftieth Anniversary this year, is that Instinet’s founding mission was to connect people with information, and with each other, to trade more efficiently. When you look past the awesome complexity, velocity and scale of today’s global financial markets, this still remains the essence of what we do.

I can’t tell you today exactly what the marketplace will look like fifty years from now. But I can tell you that our goal is to still be there, at the front edge of where it is going.

 

Trading Software Chat: Rafael Paiva, CoralBlocks

With Rafael Paiva,
Managing Director, CoralBlocks

What’s the story of how CoralBlocks came into existence? What market gap did you identify that needed to be filled?

CoralBlocks was born to help firms that want to build their own low-latency trading platforms: –  to have control and flexibility, without having to write and maintain every single element of it. We stripped down the common components from a typical trading platform and built the leanest and meanest manifestations of them, with a very clean architecture and APIs. They all have top performance and zero garbage collection across the board.

We started the company with the idea of building CoralSequencer, our messaging middleware, but we quickly saw that we needed a less ambitious approach at first in order to get market adoption.

That’s when the Blocks concept came to life – several smaller components that could be more easily understood and could be added to any infrastructure in smaller steps. CoralFIX came as a natural block for us and was very well accepted from the get-go.

You are a relatively new player in a very competitive landscape. How did you get traction?

Obviously, risk is seriously managed in this industry. We were very fortunate in that we engaged with several large, technologically sophisticated firms that identified our potential and were able to verify our quality through evaluations and become clients. As a result, we now have several very successful implementations and in 2019 we closed a record number of deals. We are enormously thankful to our early adopters. 

Who are CoralBlocks’ key clients, and what are their main technological pain points? 

Our current clients are banks, exchanges and prop trading firms. We have two specific entry points: greenfield platform development for the first time on a new venture, or for a major technology revamp our clients usually go for the full CoralBlocks suite. Since we have a wide array of components, some of our clients might want to optimize and upgrade one particular point of their stack using only a few blocks initially.

The two main drivers to adoption are time to market, and focus. With the infrastructure taken care of, we can enable clients to move quickly and have production ready platforms in 3-6 months instead of looking at a multiyear project. Additionally, this allows them to focus on what differentiates them from the competition as they know that they have a robust, top-performing foundation that can and will keep evolving over time. 

What is CoralSequencer and why is it important? 

CoralSequencer is our Multicast UDP messaging bus. Basically it is the heart of a trading system, built on an architecture that is being recognized by a large portion of leading firms in the industry as the best approach on which to build a trading platform.

Since all elements on the distributed system listen to the full stream of messages that are processed and transmitted in a deterministic way, that solves several problems typical to a trading platform in an elegant and streamlined way. It enables thorough testing and helps reporting and compliance, since every decision made by the aggregate platform can be reproduced and explained. The entire system has built-in resilience, accomplished in a simpler manner as each actor can fail and be replaced without affecting the other elements.

Finally, we have a focus on performance, which is essential, and we squeezed every last drop of latency out of it.

What’s the biggest challenge you face to increase CoralBlocks adoption?

I think the hardest obstacle we have to overcome is the “buy vs.  build” debate within our clients. As mentioned, our target audience is very technologically savvy, and they want to have control over every single aspect of their platform software stack. But when they become confident in our technology and support, it becomes clear that using our battle-tested blocks decreases the risk of a project and allows them to focus their energy better without losing flexibility. And our singular focus on our Blocks allowed us to put a lot of thought and pack a lot of features that would demand a long time for clients to build from scratch and mature, which wouldn’t be practical for a team building all aspects of a platform.

What are users saying about CoralBlocks?

“Building and operating a national securities exchange requires robust, efficient, and reliable code. CoralBlocks offers just that with a unique CoralSequencer architecture. But that was expected. Where I was most pleasantly surprised was their high-touch customer service. In an environment where immediate action is needed at any moment’s notice, CoralBlocks is there for us every single time. We enjoy working with CoralBlocks and look forward to doing so in the future.” -Hyon Lee, Software Architect, LTSE

“We have been working with CoralBlocks for a while now, and two aspects stand out: the product’s top performance and clean architecture, and the level of engagement with our team. They embrace clients’ challenges and ideas and add to their roadmap with a very fast turnaround.” -Kathryn Zhao, Global Head of Electronic Trading, Cantor Fitzgerald


What does the future hold for CoralBlocks?

As we grow our clients’ ecosystem and our technology gets stressed in different directions, we are packing a lot of new useful features. Our testing layer is becoming more and more robust, and we will keep innovating so our clients will keep getting new benefits along the way.

We are also working on a CoralBlocks certification program to strengthen our developer community. A strong developer community is essential for our evolution and that has benefits for everyone.

We are really excited to push our roadmap forward and also develop new product ideas.  

Australia FIX Conference

By Yemi Oluwi, Co-Chair, Australia Working Group, FIX Trading Community, and Head of Technology, National Stock Exchange of Australia and Eugene Budovsky, Co-Chair, Australia Working Group, FIX Trading Community, and Head of Low Touch Equities Execution, Australia, Credit Suisse.

The FIX Conference has been running annually in Sydney for the past 11 years, and is considered the premier equity trading event in Australia. The fact that we are co-chairs of the FIX Australia Working Group adds an element of bias to this assessment, however the conference on the 17th of October truly lived up to this standard.  The event sported a diverse and interesting line-up of speakers ranging from CEOs, to regulators, to quantum-computing experts. The key theme throughout the conference touched broadly on how technology is changing the face of trading, and many of the presenters focused on how they are taking advantage of technological developments to either become more efficient, or more profitable, or both.

Proceedings opened with a fascinating fire-side chat with Virtu Financial CEO Doug Cifu hosted by Joe Kassel (former Head of Exposure Management at AMP). The term “fire-side chat” often invokes a degree of cynicism, however Doug and Joe really lived up to the format with a very candid conversation covering Virtu’s history, the recent ITG acquisition, Doug’s expensive passion for ice hockey, and the colourful story of Doug’s twitter handle @Dougielarge (spoiler alert: it involves multiple A-list rappers). Tying back to the theme of using technology to become more profitable and efficient, Doug believes that the key to Virtu’s success is their brand new tech stack built in 2008 which is very scalable. Commenting on the KCG acquisition, Doug remarked “The world screams for efficiency. KCG did not have a revenue problem, they had an expense problem”.

Left to right: Joe Kassel, AMP Capital; Douglas Cifu, Virtu Financial

As technology changes the face of trading, regulation must follow. Calissa Aldrige’s ASIC Regulatory Updates covered focus on what are now old staples of cyber security and data collection, expanding into technological resilience of all participants. In order to enhance regulatory capability, better tools are being acquired, including the use of AI and Machine Learning. Computing needs are also driving ASIC to consider utilising cloud computing for their own purposes – an indication of how far cloud technology has come.

RegTech is increasingly being used to manage the industry’s regulatory burden, and the trends in this area were discussed by a panel of compliance and RegTech specialists. Ben Gatward, Tower Research head of Compliance for Asia, commented that with increased regulatory sophistication comes an increased burden on financial intermediaries, and that “Humans just can’t do all the work, RegTech is inevitable”. The panel heard that the most common areas where RegTech is currently having an impact are data collection/reporting, and data analysis/decision making.

Trading tools are always evolving to meet new demands. Evolution of current tools was discussed in the morning, where there was a look at several improvements on handling parent-child order flow. Just before the coffee break there was a look at how AI is impacting trading and workflow automation. While still early days, some use cases are seeing significant benefits and there is a good level of excitement in the area. AI is also being applied to the area of TCA to bring new insights out of the data. These new insights lead to profitable changes in trading. Flextrade’s Dan Enstedt, when asked what the buy-side really want, answered simply “Liquidity.” Modern trading tools are an increasingly important part of the solution to that problem.

A FIX conference wouldn’t be complete without gazing into the crystal ball gaze in to some very advanced technology. Quantum computing fits this bill very well and Lloyd Hollenberg gave an overview of how quantum computing works and what the potential application are. Quantum computing threatens to make traditional encryption obsolete by being able to crack uncrackable keys. Just the fear of that happening is altering the way encryption is being assessed and planned for. So even when a technology has not matured – or even arrived – it can have impacts on the present.

Todd Prado, First Sentier Investors

The conference rounded out with two panels covering current buy-side priorities. Jason Lapping (Dimensional), Will Psomadelis (Schroders) and Teresa Woodward (TRowe Price) shared some insight into how their firms are using trading to add value to the investment process, with some extremely varied approaches discussed. Schroders developed an alpha decay model to prime the execution strategy, but takes a relatively hands-off approach to the underlying design of broker algos, preferring to harvest execution data to construct their own forecasting models. The output of this process is used to predict which algo, from a diverse group each with their own objectives and behaviours, will perform better for a specific order in given market conditions. Dimensional on the other hand uses its their own internal TCA to fine-tune its desired trading behaviour, and feed very specific expectations down to their broker panel on how the algos should operate. While the approaches are very different, both have resulted in significantly reducing frictional costs.

James Giarratano, AU & NZ, Deutsche Bank AG;
Janelle Manchee, IFM Investors; Andrew Briscoe, First Sentier Investors

After the sessions it was time for more informal mingling at the cocktail reception. The more relaxed setting allows for more intimate questioning and meetings. We’ve always found this a valuable addition to the formal sessions; greater understandings of the people we deal with leads to more trust and better outcomes.

Left to right: Eugene Budovsky, Credit Suisse; Jason Lapping, Dimensional Fund Advisors; Teresa Woodard, T. Rowe Price; Will Psomadelis, Schroders Investment Management

Putting the conference together is the effort of many, many people and a lot of collaboration from individuals in the industry – a key strength and reason it brings such a great and diverse body of knowledge together. This gives a good overview of the topics covered, however in the short space we’ve been given it hasn’t been possible to mention everyone. We are extremely grateful to all those involved for providing their time and valuable expertise to the conference. It couldn’t have happened without them. We are grateful for all those people and organisations that contributed, and the support both Credit Suisse and NSX have provided to us to make this happen.

We are looking forward to next year – with 2020 vision!

A Smarter Way to Get Options Data

Trading options isn’t easy.

The equity derivatives market trades to the beat of a different drum with investors not just having to choose whether to simply buy or sell, but decide whether the options contract is either a put or call, what strike price to execute the option at and the expiration date of said contract, just to name a few. Getting this information quickly, accurately and specifically can be a daunting task for the professional trader, let alone the retail one.

Addressing this issue, Nasdaq recently unveiled a new service, Nasdaq Smart Options, which allows for easier access to essential options market data. Nasdaq Smart Options provides a more manageable and less resource-intensive data feed from the U.S. options markets in real time, drawing the essential data from the standard Options Price Reporting Authority (OPRA) data feed. It is available to U.S. registered broker dealers, advisors and members of the public.

Oliver Albers, Nasdaq

The Nasdaq Smart Options feed supports the National Best Bid and Offer (NBBO) and Last Sale trade messages, as well as administrative messages for all listed options. Individual exchange BBO data is excluded, which significantly reduces bandwidth cost and contributes to savings of more than 80% of the cost of connecting to the full OPRA data feed. The curated data package presents a lower cost alternative for advisors and the investing public. This means more investors can leverage options data to gain insights and make better-informed decisions.

Oliver Albers, Senior Vice President and Head of Strategic Partnerships with Nasdaq’s Global Information Services, spoke with Traders Magazine about the new service and the need for it.

“There has been a high barrier of entry for the options market because the intense volume of messages with more than 50 billion messages per day,” Albers began. “Nasdaq Smart Options changes the game and opens the door to a wider population of users with a feed that reduces the bandwidth needed by 80%.”

Jay Vanerstrom, CAPIS

, Vice President and Manager Derivatives at CAPIS, said that from a broker perspective, getting data at a cheaper price was a good thing for the market. He explained that taking the full OPRA feed is quite expensive.

“If this product reduces data costs, then that is a benefit to those that trade this market,” Vanerstrom said. “And in looking at what comes in the OPRA data feed, many people have no need for the micro data included—it’s just not part of the trading decision-making process.”

Spencer Mindlin, capital markets analyst at Aite Group, explained that price discovery is performed differently in the options market than in the equities market. The equities market, he said, is an order-driven market, while the options market is a quote-driven market. Without liquidity providers able and willing to make markets in options, the price discovery process would break down, and the market with it. It is here where Smart Options can have a very positive impact.

“More options for how to purchase options data is certainly a good thing, and over the past two to three years the market has seen new types of investors entering and participating in the options market,” he said.

But with all that extra bandwidth comes a flood of new data. While a professional trader with hyper fast computing power on his trading desk can process, parse and act on this data, what about the retail trader and his iMac?

Spencer Mindlin,
Aite Group

“While everyone has to pay for access to the OPRA feed, actually processing it is like drinking from a firehose. We offer something that firms of all shapes and sizes can use to leverage options in a much more efficient manner from a hardware and infrastructure perspective,” Albers said.

Aite’s Mindlin agreed that the product is for market participants that do not need everything OPRA offers, and Smart Options should reduce costs if the target client segments opt for this feed instead of a full OPRA feed.

“The number of market makers participating in the U.S. listed equity options space has dropped precipitously over the past few years, and liquidity has mostly coalesced around the largest of options market makers with sufficient scale to manage the risk and costs of data and technology required to participate,” Mindlin said. “This has changed the contours of participants in the options market, and many people we’ve spoken with recently express concerns about a lack of participants and its effect on liquidity.”

That said, Mindlin added is that the high costs to participate in the options space has been pushing liquidity providers out of the market. This in turn impacts liquidity, particularly the most liquid and highly-traded names. The costs to participate for liquidity partners is also reflected in the spread.

“This is often more pronounced than the equities market—again, because the options market is a quote-driven market where liquidity is highly dependent upon liquidity providers,” Mindlin said.

QUICK TAKE: Baird’s Miller Offers 2020 Outlook

So, what does the future hold for the equities market?

Hmm.

Jack Miller, Head of Trading with Baird, shared with Traders Magazine some of his thoughts on what he saw as the biggest news and trends to emerge during the year, as well as what’s high on his list of topics to watch in 2020.

First, Miller looked at regulation as 2019 focused on Rule 606 acceptance, approval and compliance and also Rule 611. He said 2020 will be the year of data.

“Debate around key rules wound up somewhat tempered this year by a series of delays,” Miller began. “While no one likes the feeling of staring at a stopped clock, there is something to be said for a more deliberate approach where many of these rules are concerned. Not to be lost in the waiting game, however, is the fact that all of these significant changes are only going to make data and the ability to assimilate and process that data all the more important. It’s not a stretch to predict that 2020 will be the ‘year of data’ in the trading world.”

Next, Miller, a trader himself, discussed there will be a focus on how to improve trading in small-cap equities. Small -caps, which don’t benefit from as much research and liquidity, are often more difficult to trade when compared to mid- and large-cap stocks.

“This will be a major topic to watch in 2020 and the SEC has already made it clear that this is a priority,” he said.” There is a growing realization that a one-size-fits-all approach to market structure doesn’t work across all market caps.”

And what about the buy-side? While the sell-side has spent several years undergoing radical transformation from think multiple silos and bespoke personnel to a more electronic trading consultant approach, the buy-side is now also changing. Constrained spending, competing for broker attention and massive technology spend on data and data manipulation are among the chief worries.

“I’ve been talking about this for a while, and the trends that have changed the role of the buyside trading desk only accelerated in 2019 and appear ready to gain even more steam in 2020,” Miller began. “Key among this discussion is the explosion of data and the growing expectation that all trading decisions will find support within that data. It’s a trend that presents great opportunities for those teams that are embracing data and harnessing it to its full potential.”

Lastly, Miller said the exchange marketplace and trading venue space will continue to undergo change. And while at first it seemed like consolidation was the way things were headed, the converse has happened. The advent of new marketplaces can afford the buy-side better and cheaper opportunities to trade.

“I think conceptually the entry of some new competition is a good thing, and while the three major players – NYSE, NASDAQ, CBOE – are likely to remain firmly entrenched, the competition will be good for all since it’s going to force all of the exchanges, both established and new, to think about the approaches and services they need to offer to grow, or in some cases keep, their clients. That said, this will only add to the debate surrounding connectivity costs and exchange proliferation in general.”

Electronic Market Makers Gain Share In FX

Non-bank electronic market-makers have penetrated deeply into the foreign exchange market that was exclusive to bank dealers five years ago according to the latest Bank for International Settlements’ Triennial Survey.

The BIS survey said the share of principal trading firms in spot electronic trading with buy-side clients rose to 32%, up from 10% three years ago, citing the 2019 Euromoney survey.

“What differentiates these new players from traditional bank dealers is that they substitute speed for balance sheet,” added BIS. “As they have morphed into market-makers, alongside main FX dealing banks, they have become an integral part of FX intermediation and a key determinant of liquidity conditions, particularly in the spot market.”

The survey continued that electronic trading in FX first took off in the inter-dealer market, but in recent years the dealer-to-customer segment has seen the strongest rise in electronification.

BIS continued that electronic execution allows for fast trading and therefore contributes to overall FX turnover growth.

“In aggregate, the share of FX trading done electronically edged up only slightly to 56% in 2019,” added BIS. “However, there are notable differences in the progress of electronification across instruments, and in inter-dealer versus dealer-to-customer market segments.”

Electronic platforms

Instinet, owned by Japanese bank Nomura, today announced the launch of Newport FX, an agency-model electronic trading platform for spot FX. Newport FX is a web-based desktop application for the buy side that can be accessed through the firm’s Newport execution management system platform, direct FIX API, or on a stand-alone basis.

Ralston Roberts, global chief executive of Instinet Incorporated, said in a statement: “Connecting counterparties, providing aggregated access to liquidity, and applying technology to increase efficiency have been our fundamental principles throughout Instinet’s 50-year history.”

Citi last week said it had appointed electronic trading platform provider Rapid Addition as one of its core FIX platform partners for foreign exchange trading. The bank continued that electronic trading has grown rapidly and now represents 80% of global customer FX trading volume due to demands for increased price transparency and automated workflow.

Mark Meredith, global head of FX electronic trading and algorithmic execution at Citi, said in a statement: “It is vitally important that we are highly competitive in the field of API trading, and key factors contributing to that are latency and stability characteristics.”

Offshore trading

Electronic trading tends to be booked in a few major financial hubs and so has led to a greater share of offshore trading. The BIS said London accounts for 43% of global FX turnover, while the combined share of the top four trading centres, which also include New York, Singapore and Hong Kong SAR, amounts to 75%.

“In today’s currency markets that trade around the clock, offshore trading is the norm,” added the report” The share of offshore trading for the US dollar, euro and Japanese yen – the three most traded currencies – is 79%, 84% and 74%, respectively.”

Offshore trading has risen because it is much less costly to build counterparty and credit relationships with dealers and clients in just a handful of centres than in each country separately. Placing FX desks within the same location as banks’ other functions, such as money market and treasury units, also favours major financial centres.

“In particular, major dealers tend to consolidate their electronic trading business in one of the major FX hubs,” added the survey. “This concentration thus partly compensates for the decentralised OTC structure of FX markets.”

FX trading volumes

Greater electronification of customer trading helped boost global foreign exchange trading volumes to $6.6 trillion per day in April this year, up from $5.1 trillion per day three years ago.

The largest single contributor to the overall FX turnover growth was an increase in trading of FX swaps, driven by the use of swaps in banks’ funding management according to BIS.

The survey said: “In particular, making NDFs tradable on electronic platforms has attracted greater volumes from hedge funds and principal trading firms.”

SFTR Industry Testing Due To Start

Industry-wide testing of the European Union’s incoming Securities Financing Transactions Regulation is due to start, although the schemas to send data to the trade repositories are not yet available.

Sunil Daswani, Trax

Sunil Daswani, senior securities lending & repo consultant at MarketAxess’ reporting subsidiary Trax, told Markets Media: “Industry-wide testing of 100 scripts, which cover all the necessary scenarios, is due to start now. Clients really want to test bilaterally with their counterparties, which should happen in January on Marketaxess platforms and will be a significant step forward.”

Daswani continued that Trax has six of the top 10 securities lenders/asset managers on its platform and two have committed to full testing so far.

The first phase of SFTR goes live in April next year and requires all securities financing transactions including repos, securities lending and margin lending trades, to be reported to an authorised trade repository the day after a trade using a unique transaction identifier. The data, consisting of approximately 150 fields, should allow supervisors to monitor market developments such as the build-up of leverage in the financial system. In addition, there are new disclosure obligations and collateral reuse obligations.

Daswani added there is a vast mix of how ready people are for SFTR. “The regulation’s impact will depend on whether the firm participates in securities lending, repo or margin financing as a prime broker,” he said.

Firms going live in Phase I will be mainly sell side organisations, who have the heaviest volumes, with some firms reporting millions of transactions each day according to Daswani.

“One major issue is that the schemas to send data to the trade repositories was incorrect and new schemas will only now be published later this month,” he added.

The European Securities and Markets Authority needs to make corrections to allow full end-to-end testing with reporting to the trade repositories. However, the market has been preparing for SFTR.

“We have seen a large growth in the use of Trax Match for pre-matching repos,” said Daswani. “We are uplifting most of the core-match fields to meet SFTR requirements.”

A Trax survey with Finadium in the summer found that one third of firms were between 0% and 25% prepared; one third were between 25% and 50% prepared and the final third between 50% and 75%.

“There has been progress since then,” Daswani said.

Electronic trading

In addition there has been an increase in electronic trading, which allows straight-through processing and more efficient reporting.

“We believe Equilend has seen a shift to on-venue trading away from over-the-counter trading as volumes and automation have grown,” he added.

Trax announced a collaboration with EquiLend, the securities finance trading, post-trade and market data provider, in 2017 to provide straight-through SFTR reporting as the largest market participants use EquiLend as a trading venue.

Mark Bryne, Equilend

Mark Byrne, vice president, post trade at EquiLend, said in a blog in September that the firm had released  the first phase of updates to the user interface screens.

“As the levels of transparency increase, clients are beginning to focus on future-state operating models, supported by our client services team, on-boarding experts and post-trade product specialists,” wrote Byrne. “We continue to work with our client base to provide innovative solutions to the challenge of data aggregation from multiple in-house systems and focus on driving up straight-through processing rates through increased automation and machine learning.”

We're Enhancing Your Experience with Smart Technology

We've updated our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy to introduce AI tools that will personalize your content, improve our market analysis, and deliver more relevant insights.These changes take effect on Aug 25, 2025.
Your data remains protected—we're simply using smart technology to serve you better. [Review Full Terms] |[Review Privacy Policy] By continuing to use our services after Aug 25, 2025, you agree to these updates.

Close the CTA